Le retour sur le lieu de travail postpandémie et la fidélisation des employés : le rôle, les défis et les inquiétudes des gestionnaires de proximité dans cette nouvelle transformation

Authors

  • Claire Morin Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières
  • Chloé Fortin-Bergeron Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières
  • Stéphanie Austin Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9289-7884

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1522/radm.no8.1841

Keywords:

Travail

Abstract

In 2022, when telework was well established in organizations, the Quebec government ended mandatory health measures, and simultaneously, removed the requirement for companies to maintain teleworking at 100%. For many companies, the abolition of these measures triggered a process aimed at bringing employees back to their workplace, that inevitably led to new challenges, new concerns and all the related uncertainty. The objective of this article is to take a look at the process and management of returning to the post-pandemic workplace. More specifically, we seek to understand how proximity managers implemented organizational directives and organized the process of returning their employees to the workplace in such a way as to maintain and rebuild their commitment. This article is an extension of an initial research approach carried out in 2021 on workforce retention at the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic. The results presented in this article are based on the analysis of thirteen semi-structured interviews conducted between April and December 2023. They show how proximity managers succeeded, or failed, in finding a balance between organizational expectations and employee needs, and show the challenges and concerns encountered, and their roles in the post-pandemic return to the workplace. They also lead us to note that the involvement of proximity managers with their employees and their presence during this return period were essential elements in helping the employees find their bearings within the organization, so that they felt fully invested in the success of this return.

References

Allen, N.J. et Meyer, J.P. (1996). Affective, continuance, and normative commitment to the organization: An examination of the construct validity. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 49, 252-276. https://doi.org/10.1006/jvbe.1996.0043

Brockner,J et Van Dijke, M. (2024). Work engagement and burnout in anticipation of physically returning to work: The interactive effect of imminence of return and self-affirmation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2023.104527

Chênevert, D., Giauque, D., Abord de Chatillon, E., Delobbe, N. et Vayre, E. (2023). Du télétravail à l’hybridité : une nouvelle manière de penser la gestion de nos organisations ? Revue internationale de psychosociologie et de gestion des comportements organisationnels, 29(77), 5-22. https://doi.org/10.54695/rips2.077.0005

Cooper-Hakim, A. et Viswesvaran, C. (2005). The construct of work commitment: Testing an integrative framework. Psychological Bulletin, 131, 241-259. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0033-2909.131.2.241

CRHA (2022). Le rôle du gestionnaire dans la préparation du retour au travail (postpandémie). https://carrefourrh.org/outils/guides-pratiques/role-gestionnaire-retour-travail-postpandemie

Fritz, C., Auten, D. et Caughlin, D. (2021). Reattachment to work in the morning and day-level leader outcomes. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2021.103617

Fritz, C. et Taylor, M. (2020). Detaching from and reattaching to work: The dance of work-nonwork balance. Organizational Dynamics, 49(4). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orgdyn.2019.04.010

Griffeth, R.W., Hom, P.W. et Gaertner, S. (2000). A meta-analysis of antecedents and correlates of employee turnover: Uptade, moderator tests, and research implications for the millennium. Journal of Management, 26, 463-488. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920630002600305

Heimburger, C. (2022). Les effets du télétravail sur l’engagement et la performance adaptative des salariés : une mise en perspective des théories des comportements organisationnels en situation de déspatialisation. Revue internationale de psychosociologie et de gestion des comportements organisationnels, 28(74), 49-70. https://doi.org/10.3917/rips1.074.0049

Meyer, J.P. et Allen, N.J. (1991). A three-component conceptualization of organizational commitment. Human Resource Management Review, 1(1), 61-89. https://doi.org/10.1016/1053-4822(91)90011-Z

Morin, C., Fortin-Bergeron, C. et Austin, S. (2022). LA fidélisation de la main-d’oeuvre en contexte de forte incertitude : le rôle du leadership des gestionnaires de proximité. Ad Machina, 6(1), 118-130. https://doi.org/10.1522/radm.no6.1507

Parent-Lamarche, A. (2022). Teleworking, Work engagement, and Intention to Quit during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Same Storm, Different Boats? International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(3), 1267. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19031267

Sonnentag, S. et Kühnel, J. (2016). Coming back to work in the morning: Psychological detachment and reattachment as predictors of work engagement. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 21(4), 379. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/ocp0000020

Sonnentag, S., Eck, K, Fritz, C. et Kühnel, J. (2020). Morning reattachment to work and work engagement during the day: a look at day-level mediators. Journal of Management, 46(8), 1408-1435. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206319829823

Yuan, Z., Ye, Z et Zhong, M. (2021). Plug back into work, safely: Job reattachment, leader safety commitment, and job engagement in the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Applied Psychology, 106(1), 62. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/apl0000860

Published

2024-12-13